The cover image of Netflix’s new documentary on Civil War Genral Unconditional Surrender Grant shows a confederate soldier which is quite ironi…wait a minute…is that a mosin nagant!!
The cover image of Netflix’s new documentary on Civil War Genral Unconditional Surrender Grant shows a confederate soldier which is quite ironi…wait a minute…is that a mosin nagant!!
War would have been a lot different if those fuck face traitors have mosins
Proper-Award2660 on
So how many inaccurate “documentaries” is this ?
Elevator829 on
lmao thats baaaad
CG-Firebrand on
Dudes upset about the Odyssey are being very quiet about the confeddies having Russian rifles some 15-20 years before they were manufactured
TheDarkChambers1 on
I really liked this documentary but yeah that’s a rough mistake.
CAS966 on
So when are we gonna get some more Alternate History shows in general?
Rathalos-487 on
That’s like thinking they used muskets in WW1.
1RehnquistyBoi on
I’m getting flashbacks to the World War series on the history channel which had Douglas MacArthur leading Stuart Tanks in WWI.
4FriedChickens_Coke on
Even with advanced weaponry the Confederates still lost
successfullynumb on
Is this a documentary based in Harry Turtledove’s alternate universe?
Gunz-n-Brunch on
Viewers – That’s a rifle
Netflix – No it’s a musket
Viewer – It’s a rifle! I can see the bolt action
Netflix – Look, it’s got wood on it!
Viewers – …So?
Netflix – SoOo, if it’s got wood on it, it’s a MUSKET!
dead_meme_comrade on
Is that Chris W Smith from the famous YouTube channel. Chris & Jack
Knoberchanezer on
Aside from the dramatised and visual inaccuracies, it’s actually a pretty good documentary about Grant.
Ironlord_13 on
Reminds me of in Sharpe they would get mosins or other bolt actions to extra’s because there weren’t enough baker rifles to go around
thequietthingsthat on
Is ir just called “Grant”? Cause History channel did a miniseries on him with the same name a few years back
vulcan1358 on
Goddamn, I know Netflix is changing major demographic qualities of established characters and persons for “DEI Inclusivity” but replacing the 1853 Enfield something in a whole different category of weapons is the gun ‘tism equivalent of the Square Block in the Square Hole video.
16 Comments
War would have been a lot different if those fuck face traitors have mosins
So how many inaccurate “documentaries” is this ?
lmao thats baaaad
Dudes upset about the Odyssey are being very quiet about the confeddies having Russian rifles some 15-20 years before they were manufactured
I really liked this documentary but yeah that’s a rough mistake.
So when are we gonna get some more Alternate History shows in general?
That’s like thinking they used muskets in WW1.
I’m getting flashbacks to the World War series on the history channel which had Douglas MacArthur leading Stuart Tanks in WWI.
Even with advanced weaponry the Confederates still lost
Is this a documentary based in Harry Turtledove’s alternate universe?
Viewers – That’s a rifle
Netflix – No it’s a musket
Viewer – It’s a rifle! I can see the bolt action
Netflix – Look, it’s got wood on it!
Viewers – …So?
Netflix – SoOo, if it’s got wood on it, it’s a MUSKET!
Is that Chris W Smith from the famous YouTube channel. Chris & Jack
Aside from the dramatised and visual inaccuracies, it’s actually a pretty good documentary about Grant.
Reminds me of in Sharpe they would get mosins or other bolt actions to extra’s because there weren’t enough baker rifles to go around
Is ir just called “Grant”? Cause History channel did a miniseries on him with the same name a few years back
Goddamn, I know Netflix is changing major demographic qualities of established characters and persons for “DEI Inclusivity” but replacing the 1853 Enfield something in a whole different category of weapons is the gun ‘tism equivalent of the Square Block in the Square Hole video.