Share.

    31 Comments

    1. OnTheList-YouTube on

      They didn’t double tap it and say “This ain’t going anywhere”!

      Rooky mistake!

    2. Great now I’m thinking about that day our teacher was excited to let us watch a shuttle take off

    3. Large-Ad7436 on

      Why did it look like a bunch of vapor was shoowing the opposite way after it came apart?
      Wouldn’t it just stop working?

    4. The really interesting part to me is the cone flies off and doesn’t make/change the sound.

    5. -Puss_In_Boots- on

      After the back cup (I know nothing about rockets…) explodes, the blue circle effect remains and it looks so surreal being in balance so far away from the engine.

    6. Talusthebroke on

      And that’s why we test things! We want it to go boom when lives aren’t at stake, not when they are

    7. As I recall, this experimental engine had been 3D printed, and the burnthrough was caused by a void in one of the layers.

    8. LittleMissAhrens on

      “There are a thousand lessons to be learned from failure, but seldom few from success.”

      A failure like this is a great teacher, and is better that it happened in a controlled testing environment, than on a launch! Congrats to the engineers who now know how not to do it, and will build a better engine next time!

    9. I live in a city where these engines are commonly tested. I think Blue Origin does most of the testing around here now. They are pretty loud. Usually its just a low rumble, sometimes it’s a series of booms that rattle windows.

      NASA has been known to purposely stress test to failure. These stress tests can result in some very loud booms. I remember one instance; the furthest call we got that I heard about was from a city ~60 miles away. The bigger booms will break windows of nearby houses and business. Living here since 1992, I generally don’t even notice the normal engine tests.

    Leave A Reply