Share.

    28 Comments

    1. Complete-Sort1617 on

      They were potentially more intelligent than us because biological stressors like being hunted by predators and needing to find food and resources forced them to have higher IQ’s.

      It’s hypothesized IQ has been going down ever so steadily since the invention of agriculture.

      All they really lacked was an education.

    2. Have you seen the photos of what they (supposedly) looked like? Bros could cut your arm in two by squeezing it in their hand.

    3. a_ginger_guy on

      Do you think the “couldn’t happen to me I’m built different” sentiment comes from a time when people were literally built different?

    4. PM_ME_YUR_S3CRETS on

      Most didnt survive. The average lifespan was probably 30. My evidence: there were no where near 8 billion humans. Capable? Yes. Probably as much as many other mammals we see today.

    5. Broad_Geologist7998 on

      prehistoric humans weren’t stupid, they were highly skilled survivors who adapted to extreme conditions without modern tools.

    6. Individually, they were smarter than us.

      In a group, we beat them by a mile

    7. DJ-Halfbreed on

      Bruh no lie a caveman would whoop my WHOLE ass, “Ug” *thwack* last damn thing i ever hear😭

      Battle/Hunting IQ like a wolf or something too i bet, trap me in a corner with a pack and call it a wrap

    8. floydymoiyte on

      So by this logic a monkey living in the jungle is smarter than me because it can survive in the jungle and I can’t?

    9. justmanbearpig on

      modern humans are just idiots grunting at each other over the internet

    10. Meanwhile we panic when the Wi-Fi drops for five minutes. Respect to the real survivors

    11. TheOneTruBob on

      We have been roughly the same amount of smart for something like 250k years.

    12. wibbly-water on

      Linguist here.

      There is A LOT of debate about the origins of human languages – and plenty of theories that would amount to language at some point being something like “grunting at eachother” (or more precisely *gesturing at eachother, screaming at eachother* and *singing at eachother*). But most evidence I have seen would suggest that such “simple language” would have been a number of species ago.

      Neanderthals and Homo Erectus both seem to have had decently developed bones which vocal chords attached to – meaning they had the capabilities for language. There is some evidence Neanderthals had religion, which usually requires communication because a personal supernatural / spiritual belief usually needs to be spoken about before it is shared with another.

      Evidence from human hunter-gatherers would suggest that those living those lifestimes absolutely do and can have stunningly complex languages also. Equally intricate if not more so than those who live (post)-agriculture lives.

    13. thechecker111 on

      There was a chokepoint in history with only 10,000 humans being alive.

    Leave A Reply