next try:
/con x alt<State or Major City>
or
/con x <Video Game or Sport Subs>
bmrtt on
A lot of these subs mass banned people who didn’t even post on them before just for being active on Conservative sub so that’s not exactly interesting they don’t share a lot of users.
Patient_Commentary on
that… makes a lot of sense..
5959195 on
I wonder if r/Conservative users not posting in any of the other subs listed is because they have so many bots there or due to some ideological difference from the users. Were any measured taken to exclude fake accounts?
BallerGuitarer on
Sounds like people who post on r/politics need to get off social media. They probably just rile themselves up over all the news happening everywhere all the time.
AuDHD-Polymath on
Isn’t this chart a little redundant? It shows each number twice (the matrix is symmetric). Also the color shading is hard to distinguish… the range of blues is too small
_WhatchaDoin_ on
For the beautiful part:
Maybe you need just the top left triangle (moving the legend from the bottom to top), or bottom right, and/or make the diagonal top/left to bottom/right.
Currently the displayed data is doubled but it does not add any value, just some confusion.
LoopyPro on
It might have to do something with mods pre-emptively banning people who are active in the “wrong” communities.
HerpesHans on
Data is ugly, remove half the boxes
kchoze on
I recently made a critical, respectful and grounded criticism of a study on r/science about how the questions used to gauge support for the “Great Replacement theory” were loaded and biased, and that this made the study dubious, and I received a permanent ban as a result.
I did run my criticism by AIs to make sure it was reasonable, and they said it was. But no matter.
I was banned from r/worldnews during COVID because I quoted the CDC director about the vaccines not preventing infections by summer 2021.
These big subs are run by belligerent progressives who ban anyone who voices discordant opinions, ESPECIALLY if these opinions are well argued and grounded in science and facts.
10 Comments
next try:
/con x alt<State or Major City>
or
/con x <Video Game or Sport Subs>
A lot of these subs mass banned people who didn’t even post on them before just for being active on Conservative sub so that’s not exactly interesting they don’t share a lot of users.
that… makes a lot of sense..
I wonder if r/Conservative users not posting in any of the other subs listed is because they have so many bots there or due to some ideological difference from the users. Were any measured taken to exclude fake accounts?
Sounds like people who post on r/politics need to get off social media. They probably just rile themselves up over all the news happening everywhere all the time.
Isn’t this chart a little redundant? It shows each number twice (the matrix is symmetric). Also the color shading is hard to distinguish… the range of blues is too small
For the beautiful part:
Maybe you need just the top left triangle (moving the legend from the bottom to top), or bottom right, and/or make the diagonal top/left to bottom/right.
Currently the displayed data is doubled but it does not add any value, just some confusion.
It might have to do something with mods pre-emptively banning people who are active in the “wrong” communities.
Data is ugly, remove half the boxes
I recently made a critical, respectful and grounded criticism of a study on r/science about how the questions used to gauge support for the “Great Replacement theory” were loaded and biased, and that this made the study dubious, and I received a permanent ban as a result.
I did run my criticism by AIs to make sure it was reasonable, and they said it was. But no matter.
I was banned from r/worldnews during COVID because I quoted the CDC director about the vaccines not preventing infections by summer 2021.
These big subs are run by belligerent progressives who ban anyone who voices discordant opinions, ESPECIALLY if these opinions are well argued and grounded in science and facts.