Share.

    25 Comments

    1. Electronic-Vast-3351 on

      Rome didn’t collapse 20,000 to 15,000 years ago during the Last Glacial Maximum?

    2. Moose-Rage on

      Well yeah. The Age of Exploration was spurred by the ERE’s collapse and Ottomans taking over the Silk Road so Christian kingdoms wanted to find an alternative route to India. So they sailed and guess what was in the way…

    3. MinuteWaitingPostman on

      Coincidentally, the two are sort of related.

      After the Ottomans took over, they began imposing heftier and heftier tolls on trade from the Far East, so European powers begame increasingly interested in seeing if modern ships could sail across the world and reach India that way. As it turned out, there was a whole two continents on the route

    4. EatTheRichIsPraxis on

      The French found out the Basques had been in North America, because the First Nations greeted French traders in Algonquian-Basque pidgin.

    5. delscorch0 on

      I guess that would be 971, since L’Anse aux Meadows was settled in 1021 in Newfoundlland

    6. Juan de Fuca was a Graeco-Spanish explorer and son or grandson of a Byzantine admiral iirc. There must have been a few who switched into Spanish service.

    7. The_Letter_W on

      It’s also weird to think that the Aztec empire fell the same year that Martin Luther was excommunicated.

    8. Well that’s not true America was disvovered while Eastern Roman Empire still stood.

    9. Daveallen10 on

      Ah, the age old debate of “when did Rome fall?”

      I would argue the Byzantine Empire was a successor state distinct from “true” Rome.

      *Grabs popcorn*

    10. Really what OP means is that “one of the times America was discovered took place less than 50 years after one of the times Rome fell”

    11. Because we/many people still associate the Roman Empire with the western Roman empire

    12. EnamelKant on

      I really feel learning there was a whole new continent full of barbarian tribes just waiting to be subdued for The Glory of Rome would have really revitalized the Empire.

      We could have gotten a Commentarii de Bello Americo. A new Caesar crossing the Gulf of St Lawrence (and immediately turning back around). A census written in Greek for some reason. Would have been awesome.

    13. Wrong, Leif Erikson reach North America when Eastern Roman Empire still exist

    14. Lenz_Mastigia on

      You mean, the american civil war ended less than 60 years after the roman empire truly fell…

    15. I’m sorry but didn’t Leif Erikson arrive to the Americas around the year 1000AD? How is this claim reasonable?

    16. Succulent_Relic on

      The question of “when the Americas” were discovered has several answers. Columbus was not the first, Leif Erikson did it before him. But given they came upon a people there, that means the Vikings weren’t the first either.

    17. GenosseAbfuck on

      The Americas were discovered long before Rome. The Americas were discovered a few centuries after the end of Rome. The Americas were discovered 50 years after the end of Rome.

    18. We all know it was none other than Leif Eriksson who discovered Vinland. Truly a historic moment

    19. GustavoistSoldier on

      If Constantinople hadn’t fallen, the European colonization of the Americas would at least be delayed

    20. Less than 20 if you consider Theodoros to be the last remnant of the empire. Also you could say the americas were discovered centuries aftee the discoveries of the americas depending on the different events (natives, vikings, polynesians, maybe basques but not sure, maybe malians but not sure, …)

    Leave A Reply