At age 65–74, the top 10% of US households have $3,005,220 in net worth and the bottom 10% have $4,896.

    The gap doesn't grow proportionally with age. It widens almost 8x from $379K (under 35) to $3M (65–74).

    by Global-Thought-1049

    10 Comments

    1. I know what an age of a person is. But of a household? Is it average of the adults?

    2. Maybe I’m out of the loop, but since when did it become the norm to make an insight the title of a graph? I see it a lot on this sub.

    3. Well yes, when two numbers grow proportionately, so too does the difference between them.

    4. CoopertheFluffy on

      The wealth gap between people on the same age group is just how wealthy the wealthiest people are at those ages, because the poorest have nothing at any age.

    5. Its supposed to grow exponentially with age. If you have one person building a retirement fund throughout their life and one person perpetually living paycheck to paycheck, the former will outpace the latter exponentially in wealth, all things being equal.

      Its a very clear and informative chart, I just dont agree with the implication I get from your comments.

    6. Imagine being age 65 and not being at least 8x more successful than you were at 25.

    Leave A Reply