This analysis is intended to understand the Relative Risk Ratio (RR) of death across 50+ armed conflicts since the dawn of the 20th century.

    RR = (Military killed / Total military) ÷ (Civilians killed / Total civilians)

    Stemming from Epidemiology,Relative risk (RR) is a key measure used to compare the probaility of events happening in exposed populations vs unexposed populations.

    • RR < 1 — civilians die at a higher proportional rate than soldiers (signature of genocide / mass atrocity)
    • RR ≈ 1 — civilian/combatant distinction has collapsed
    • RR » 1 — soldiers bear the fighting; civilians largely spared

    Bars are on a split scale — log above RR=1, linear below — so the sub-1 tail doesn't sprawl. Where credible sources disagree the bar becomes a stacked range: progressively lighter shades mark each source, with white ticks at boundaries.

    by JoshuaJosephson

    10 Comments

    1. People are going to downvote this because it conflicts with their viewpoint that the wars in Gaza were genocides. 

    2. DeathFlameStroke on

      Reposting my comment:
      Puts modern day into perspective, and trends show that total war/independent actors are way deadlier than limited conflicts involving proper states

    3. always_wear_pyjamas on

      Very interesting analysis, even with all the nuance that we could argue about.

      Concerning the Iraq-Iran war 1980-1988, I think that thousands of young boys brainwashed to wear military uniforms, don a key around their neck and run into the field, would like you have a word with you about the nuances in the distinctions between mil/civ.

    4. Ok-Cantaloupe-9946 on

      No credibility with the IDF as a source. It’s like getting holocaust numbers from the Wehrmacht.

    5. Dahm didn’t expect Russia-Ukraine to be so high. Really shows that both sides claim of genocide is BS. On the other hand, the extremely high military casualties on both sides are probably driving this number so high

    Leave A Reply