Share.

    17 Comments

    1. Commercial_hater on

      Yeah I prefer this over the glorified teeth-baring Americans are obsessed with.

    2. rabbihimself on

      Cameras back then took approximately 30 – 40 seconds to “take” the picture, smiling that long would’ve been tough. There’s a running gag in the movie A MILLION WAYS TO DIE IN THE WEST about this.

      EDIT: a few of you have illuminated how off the mark I was. Thank you for teaching me the facts!

    3. big_d_usernametaken on

      My late MIL, born in 1919, said that having your picture taken back then, and particularly in the decades before that, were serious occasions, especially formal portraits.

    4. From their clothing styles, definitely *not* the 1920s. Depending on how frugal and conservative these individuals were (looking at the last photo in particular), this could have been from the late 1930s to the mid-1950s. I guarantee that camera and film speeds had absolutely nothing to do with why the woman didn’t smile, and I can’t believe that she would have seen these as “formal portraits” that required decorum. I’d bet that she simply didn’t feel like smiling.

    5. Alternative_Race_117 on

      The cameras were slower. You had to stay still or it would be blurry

    6. Faux_extrovert on

      My grandmother said smiling for no reason made you look like a fool. She was born in the 1930s and rarely smiled in pictures.

    7. ComfortablyNumb2425 on

      This lady doesn’t look that old if you zoom in. She just is dressed a bit old for her age.

    Leave A Reply