Shooter had a transwoman partner/roommate at college, same dorm.
Shooter was raised in a republican family but rebelled against the views of Charlie Kirk, and it was Kirk’s views that upset/hurt the shooter’s partner.
His motivation was to avenge his partner’s pain.
Those are the news reports today from both liberal, mainstream, and conservative news outlets today.
Supporttroll on
Yep, the violent right do what they do best, lie, incite violence against innocent people, and murder their opponents. Just like Jesus!
Preemptively_Extinct on
Meanwhile, Scripps news said this morning that Kirk was shot because the shooter “didn’t agree with his views.”.
PaulyNi on
The shooter was not a right winger, not even close.
TheGukos on
In all seriousness:
Was the guy actually right wing? I basically heard everything at this point, but most sources I found (no matter what corner they put him ) are heresay or “anonymous”
hoelledavid on
I mean leftist viloence stats look way better but tell me this is an informed opinion….
Autumn7242 on
Projection of violence as the first solution.
davechri on
This is exactly right.
Maybe this will be the turning point where republicans join with Democrats to try to stem gun violence.
Ok_Captain_3569 on
False information. He was not a registered Republican. This has already been debunked by pretty much every media outlet. More b.s. from the left.
Quit spreading lies.
If this is true, then why do t you cite your source?
12 Comments
Leftists define liberal and conservative about as accurately as they define man and women. They throw a dart and hope it misses the facts.
Not every right winger is like Tyler Robinson, not every leftist is like AOC.
What if it turns out that Robinson is not the shooter, but merely a patsy, as Oswald.
https://preview.redd.it/qyyh8qn177pf1.jpeg?width=680&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4d82cb171cf50ccdbad091c983fd8a929e6557fd
Every news story today frames the narrative as:
Shooter had a transwoman partner/roommate at college, same dorm.
Shooter was raised in a republican family but rebelled against the views of Charlie Kirk, and it was Kirk’s views that upset/hurt the shooter’s partner.
His motivation was to avenge his partner’s pain.
Those are the news reports today from both liberal, mainstream, and conservative news outlets today.
Yep, the violent right do what they do best, lie, incite violence against innocent people, and murder their opponents. Just like Jesus!
Meanwhile, Scripps news said this morning that Kirk was shot because the shooter “didn’t agree with his views.”.
The shooter was not a right winger, not even close.
In all seriousness:
Was the guy actually right wing? I basically heard everything at this point, but most sources I found (no matter what corner they put him ) are heresay or “anonymous”
I mean leftist viloence stats look way better but tell me this is an informed opinion….
Projection of violence as the first solution.
This is exactly right.
Maybe this will be the turning point where republicans join with Democrats to try to stem gun violence.
False information. He was not a registered Republican. This has already been debunked by pretty much every media outlet. More b.s. from the left.
Quit spreading lies.
If this is true, then why do t you cite your source?