This is a case where a red circle might actually be useful
mehItlldo on
That’s the sort of stuff a company would do when they are trying to pass off a product that doesn’t contain the actual material. “Chocoalte is a chocolate type substance”.
I’ve been noticing a lot more typos in official stuff lately. Nice catch!
pattyG80 on
They’ve trademarked chocoalte. It’s how they get the melamine in their product.
ForeverStaloneKP on
“We heard you hate our #newrecipe chocolate bars because of the low quality ingredients, fillers and poor ratios, so instead of improving the product to match what you expect and ate in the past, we decided to create a new product and charge you even more money for it”
EpponeeRae on
I initially thought the typo was that three pieces were meant to be one serving…
lipercastro on
CHOCOALTE
DangerousDisplay7664 on
40% more cocoa and 25% more milk – so back to how it was made before the American hostile takeover and the enshitification of a British institution?
ACTM on
As a designer this would feel horrifying. You’re supposed to have vigilante copy and QA checks from more than one other person, but you would still feel rather responsible for making the error in the first place.
RunRunRunRunFaster on
Well … from a legal standpoint, they didn’t call it chocolate …..
danadjinn on
Here is the circle lol. Sorry guys. Also the overall amount of cocoa solids listed on the back
29 Comments
Where are you seeing a typo?
Chocoalte is my favorite type of candy
Where’s Waldo ass typo.
CHOCOALTE!
This is a case where a red circle might actually be useful
That’s the sort of stuff a company would do when they are trying to pass off a product that doesn’t contain the actual material. “Chocoalte is a chocolate type substance”.
It’s Almost Chocolate
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KLHRjaUBb3o
Chocoalte. The guy from Star Trek Voyager?
It’s ok AI will fix it.
Now with more 35% coal!
I’ve been noticing a lot more typos in official stuff lately. Nice catch!
They’ve trademarked chocoalte. It’s how they get the melamine in their product.
“We heard you hate our #newrecipe chocolate bars because of the low quality ingredients, fillers and poor ratios, so instead of improving the product to match what you expect and ate in the past, we decided to create a new product and charge you even more money for it”
I initially thought the typo was that three pieces were meant to be one serving…
CHOCOALTE
40% more cocoa and 25% more milk – so back to how it was made before the American hostile takeover and the enshitification of a British institution?
As a designer this would feel horrifying. You’re supposed to have vigilante copy and QA checks from more than one other person, but you would still feel rather responsible for making the error in the first place.
Well … from a legal standpoint, they didn’t call it chocolate …..
Here is the circle lol. Sorry guys. Also the overall amount of cocoa solids listed on the back
https://imgur.com/a/vKfKQUF
Your first mistake was buying Cadbury’s.
Who decided 1 serve only 3 pieces of chocolate? I can eat full! 😅
Chocko-all-tay
Maybe they’re replacing the lead and cadmium with coal now.
Yep, spotted it. “Serves 3” my ass, should be “Serves 1”.
I live in south east Asia. English typos or bad grammar on products are normal for me.
0.5 Health Star Rating
Given how Cadbury chocolate is going these days maybe it’s not a typo, they just can’t legally call it chocolate any more /s
Maybe it’s not a typo and this is there way of letting you know it’s not chocolate