I mean, even at face value that’s just got an objectively correct answer of false.
You can’t even say in principle that’s true, as the laws are written so people with money are less subject to consequences.
Apprehensive-Fun4181 on
*Sorry, the question is moot. The course is called “Political Science”, which has no science and thus does not exist.*
PromiseOpen6525 on
‘There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect’
opusupo on
Is that Shaggy getting radicalized in elementary school?
Mixer-3007 on
af_cheddarhead on
Well little Bobby, maybe it’s time to learn the difference between “de jure” and “de facto”.
Advanced_Aspect_7601 on
EagleBigMac on
Affectionate-Tip-164 on
Strike out “or” and write in “and”
LoveFoolosophy on
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.
kittyonkeyboards on
This is how I felt in civics class because it was a dry reading of the intentions of our constitution and our laws, not the practical reality or theory of power.
Even before Trump you could tell the countries laws restricting executive power were just gentlemen agreements, but civics education would have you believe there were actual checks and balances.
I can’t imagine being a civics teacher in the age of Trump and trying to talk about checks and balances or an impartial judiciary with a straight face. Might as well put on clown shoes.
11 Comments
I mean, even at face value that’s just got an objectively correct answer of false.
You can’t even say in principle that’s true, as the laws are written so people with money are less subject to consequences.
*Sorry, the question is moot. The course is called “Political Science”, which has no science and thus does not exist.*
‘There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect’
Is that Shaggy getting radicalized in elementary school?
Well little Bobby, maybe it’s time to learn the difference between “de jure” and “de facto”.
Strike out “or” and write in “and”
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.
This is how I felt in civics class because it was a dry reading of the intentions of our constitution and our laws, not the practical reality or theory of power.
Even before Trump you could tell the countries laws restricting executive power were just gentlemen agreements, but civics education would have you believe there were actual checks and balances.
I can’t imagine being a civics teacher in the age of Trump and trying to talk about checks and balances or an impartial judiciary with a straight face. Might as well put on clown shoes.