Share.

    20 Comments

    1. Complete-Sort1617 on

      When I was in Mexico I was fascinated by how much more honest they are to consumers about sugar content. It was shocking.

    2. clothanger on

      >unlike in the U.S., where it just says “0”

      Can I have a screenshot of this?

    3. Goochenhaumeister on

      US food laws could be better, manufacturers can make up wacky serving sizes that’s by loopholes cause things things to “have 0 calories” that’s why one product with multiple servings has 0 but the product at a whole does

      Like TicTac‘s say zero sugar because the serving size is a TicTac (pill size sized candy), but they are in fact mostly sugar

      A good one was a cereal saying it had more protein than It actually did by counting the fact that you consume it with milk, even though it doesn’t provide the milk, the catch was it technically wasn’t a cereal but was a meal replacement that looks exactly like cereal and is sold next to the cereal in the grocery store

      I think it was honey bunches of oats cut with protein powder

    4. Unknown_User_66 on

      See, I TOLD YOU!!!! My little brother kept saying that the bottle says “Zero Calories”, so consuming the entire bottle would result in you consuming zero (0) calories, and I told him “that’s not how that works!”, and he wouldn’t believe me!!!!

    5. BloodMossHunter on

      I have a bacon jam inside my fridge right now that has “possible other ingredients”. I was like huh?

    6. Whispering_Wolf on

      US only using serving sizes and not having a general ‘per 100g’ on labels is insane to me. How would you compare two products if both have different serving sizes? You just gotta pull out a calculator in the middle of the supermarket?

    7. RchUncleSkeleton on

      Yeah the FDA is absolute garbage for allowing this kind of BS. No wonder America is the fastest nation on earth. We can’t even depend on our food labels to be truthful. They should have to label the exact amount of calories per serving regardless. They even went as far as to change the serving size on the US bottle to be 1 gram, instead of 3.

    8. TrickyArmadildo on

      Huh? This is not common in the US? I see it everywhere in the EU.

    9. MrTickles22 on

      Reaistically it’s zero calories. Nobody is eating 100 grams of tajin and living to tell the tale.

    10. sessamekesh on

      Mexico has a few really cool things around labeling. 

      That said, “per 100g” is enough Tajin to down a bull elephant. Not literally. But I don’t think anybody is downing enough Tajin to have it be a significant source of calories.

      I still really like that the information is presented there, though, silly or not.

    Leave A Reply