Share.

    17 Comments

    1. Nah he looks so clean and beautiful. Now you reminded of part 3, it’s been years since the last one

    2. Axenfonklatismrek on

      I mean thats the point, 300 is basically how Greeks would tell the Persian wars.

      The way they portrayed Xerxes is basically a weird guy according to Spartans

    3. Yeah, Given the art style of 300, I give it a lot of slack its super clear that it’s an adaptation of a comic, not a historical adaptation. I mean, the 300 greased up greek guys should make it fairly clear they’re not going for accuracy. 😛

    4. Diabolical_potplant on

      The movie based on a comic based on another movie based on a kinda loose interpretation of a story told by the Greeks to hype up themselves up?

      It’s perfectly accurate, for the spirit of the story.

    5. I always saw the depiction of Xerxes as that historical tendency to show your enemy as these unbeatable barbarians that you’re bravely resisting, making them larger and more fearsome through the telling than they actually were in real life.

      But also there’s the fact that it’s based off a comic book.

    6. A_Moon_Fairy on

      You (Hollywood) hate Xerxes because he’s a Persian who launched a punitive campaign against the Greek city-states, I hate Xerxes for interfering with the internal politics and religious doctrine of the E-ana temple at Uruk. We are not the same.

    7. 300 while a fun movie, conveniently leaves out the part where the Greeks are manipulated into attacking the Persians unprovoked.

      Persians were justified in their attack tbh

    8. I kinda understand 300 like a greek poet would dramatize it, with a bias on the greel side. If you look onto the movie with this optic, it is much easier to understand.

    9. At least they’ve portayed the obligatory Persian Goatman correctly, both historically and anatomically.
      There was at least one in every Persian court at the time, as everyone knows.

    Leave A Reply