Share.

    29 Comments

    1. The planet is easier to identify because it doesn’t have a legal team to help it hide from the footage.

    2. LunarCrisis7 on

      The planet is a composite image based of the actual images taken and on gathered data about the planet’s composition. The security footage is a shit camera

    3. realultralord on

      CCTV footage: 15 frames per second, 720p resolution, black and white colors only. Records every movement in a distinguishable manner. Several camera feeds saves simultaneously. Data capacity: About 10 – 100 GB/day. Cost: $100,000. Works autonomously.

      Telescope picture: 3 million pictures of the same, still object. Rendered by overlapping 3 million sets of slightly different raw data. Colors have been calculated, not actually taken by the sensors. Data capacity: 1000 TB/picture. Cost: a couple billion Dollars. Needs team of highly qualified lab engineers to operate and supervise 24/7.

    4. Traditional_Sail_213 on

      That photo of Saturn was actually taken by Voyager 2 when it flew by, not from Earth

    5. Mister_Normal42 on

      There’s no point in looking at WhiteHouse footage. The administration has already demonstrated that they can and will use AI to modify and outright fabricate things. The people can’t trust a single thing about the U.S. government

    6. Interesting_Return86 on

      Not all Hiltons have the James Webb security cameras. They’re still rolling them out.

    7. The quality is only low when something important happens. When I trip over my own feet in a lobby, suddenly it’s 4K IMAX quality

    8. Grumpy-Man19 on

      white house always tries to save money so the taxpayers’ money is not wasted. 😂

    9. MarzipanPlane9490 on

      Of course🤷‍♀️no one really wants to see what’s going on in the White House

    10. AngelicalBabe3 on

      I’ve seen better frame rates on a toaster. How is this even legal in a government building?

    11. To be fair, the security footage is still showing more detail.

      If that guy was on that planet the second photo wouldnt see him

    12. ProfessionalGoatFuck on

      The planet is massive as fuck + billions of dollars poured into instruments/cameras involved.. vs a more than likely cheapest option 25$ cameras lol

    13. In all seriousness, our governements lack of tech is a bit embarassing. Not only have they not updated their security system in like, 20 years. But istg every government website I try to go on must be running on Windows 98 or something with how slow and awkward it is to use.

    14. That_Guy3141 on

      One of those pictures was captured using millions of dollars worth of equipment. The other was taken with a $50 security camera from 2005.

    15. Well of course.
      Its all about the solar radiation.

      The white house is like way closer to the sun. 😁

    16. I’ve heard of “flat Earth”, but flat Saturn too? How about the rest of them? Maybe trying to dribble a flat basketball and see how that works out 🤣

    Leave A Reply