London on 24 April 1993, after Irish terrorists detonated a bomb. [1080×702]

    by OkRespect8490

    25 Comments

    1. OrangeToddlerCovefe on

      One man’s terrorist is another man’s heavily oppressed freedom fighter.

    2. I was in London the day this happened. It still amazes me how ‘normal’ these events felt. Everyone would just re-plan their journeys to avoid the affected area. The indifference staggers me now. I hope we never return to those dark days.

    3. Funny how Americans are always quick to jump in and justify IRA terrorism, but you’ll never hear them talk about Al-Qaeda freedom fighters.

    4. Georgex2inthejungle on

      What’s with the heavy anti IRA tilt on this sub recently lol, are we relitigating the Troubles or trying to rhetorically frame the Irish in light of recent events, hmmm?

      Fwiw this is unquestionably an act of terrorism, but its also worth mentioning that due to telephone warnings from the PIRA, with the express purpose of clearing the area of civilians, there was only one fatality. The goal was financial terrorism, not mass casualties, however you choose to see that.

    5. LolaDeWinter on

      I was in the vicinity of one of their bombings in Oxford Street, couldn’t hear properly for a day and the air seemed to be sucked out of the road then blasted back…it was shit…

    6. If someone posted a photo of Bloody Sunday with the title ” Derry on 30 January 1972, after British terrorists murdered 13 protesters” would people feel the same? They would be reminded the act was committed by members of the British army and not British terrorists. This act was committed by the IRA. Stop trying to frame it otherwise

    7. Confidentvelvet on

      this kind of stuff always messes with my head… like seeing a whole city just frozen in that “right after” moment feels unreal 😕 i remember walking past a building after a fire once and even that small scale felt eerie and quiet in a way that didn’t feel normal at all… can’t imagine what this must’ve felt like in real time

    8. Shark_Leader on

      Maybe they shouldn’t have oppressed the Irish for the better part of a millennium. Or taken all the good crops to sell for profit (not for the Irish, but for the British/East India Company) leaving them with only potatoes to eat, so that when the crop failed 60% of people died or left for another country. Maybe they should have let Ireland be it’s own country instead of dividing it up to keep parts of it under their sphere of influence. Just thoughts.

    Leave A Reply