Inquiring Photographer:”Judge Samuel Leibowitz has ruled that it isn’t stealing when a husband takes his wife’s money against her will. Do you agree?”January 30, 1954

    by CryptographerKey2847

    7 Comments

    1. StillSwaying on

      Mary Banker was the OG Pick-me! What a dunce. “Why hold out on the husband ?” Well perhaps he was a drunk who blew through their money every payday so that she didn’t have anything left to buy food for the family. (That was the original reason for Prohibition, btw. So many men did that every week and kids were starving. Very sad state of affairs.)

      Everyone else has common sense and morals, except Paul at the end.

      He should marry Mary, then they could live happily ever after and steal from each other until one of them wins.

      I love when you post these, u/CryptographerKey2847! They always lead to some lively discussions. Can’t wait to see what everyone else has to say!

    2. AdamantEevee on

      You can tell by the last half of Mary’s answer that the reporter gave her the biggest WTF face

    3. flindersandtrim on

      Mary Banker, you are the absolute worst. Even knows how unreasonable her views are because she cannot say a word to back up her stupid argument. 

    4. NoraCharles91 on

      Conmen rubbing their hands together reading Mary’s answer. Girl, you in danger!

    Leave A Reply