This sign at an Arizona rest stop.

    by ExpertRutabaga3415

    29 Comments

    1. kick_the_chort on

      I think this is just because the word “poisonous” is more widely recognized and understood.

    2. Fanfare4Rabble on

      Probably translates easily into more non-English languages enough to be more effective than correct.

    3. The sign is admitting defeat and knowingly using the wrong terminology (poison/venom) because more people will understand “poisonous” than “venemous”…

      The net result: sign is wrong, and it works better being wrong.

    4. GuyPronouncedGee on

      People complain about the distinction between “poisonous” and “venomous”, but I think the sign is pretty clear.  

      Imagine walking into the rest stop thinking “I’m fine as long as I don’t eat a snake!”

    5. Blochamolesauce on

      Don’t forget Valley Fever. Even the dirt is trying to kill you. Arizona = America’s Australia

    6. Mugwumps_has_spoken on

      I would make it my personal mission to buy some sheet metal to make some correct signs to ADD to each sign post.
      A Cricut or similar cutting machine and some outdoor permanent vinyl (yes you can buy the reflective kind like used on signs)

      If Arizona is like NC, its the DOT that manages the rest stops. They probably assume people are stupid (are they wrong?) and that most people don’t know the difference. Remember my fellow redditor, most people can’t properly use their, they’re or there.

    7. Drove from Las Vegas to Fort Lauderdale last July. Stopped on the side of the highway to let my dog relieve himself. I took one look at the ground, saw all the holes and said NOPE. Scooped him up and got back in the car.

    8. So basically I’ll be fine as long as I don’t attempt to consume any of them.

      But seriously I can fully see someone getting bit or stung by one of these critters then suing because the sign said “poisonous” as opposed to the more correct and applicable “venomous”.

    Leave A Reply