This is indeed pro Shah propaganda, but it doesn’t mean the quotes aren’t true.

    by SalazarSlytherin___

    25 Comments

    1. What’s really messed up is that he probably doesn’t agree with beastiality but so many people in his country are doing it that he is unable criminalise it in his book

    2. Iranian dictator vs Anti-Iranian dictator

      For some twisted reason, reddit thinks the latter is the same or better than the former.

    3. Interestingly enough both of these guys look like they could have been actors on the Sopranos

    4. Fantastic-Sock-8042 on

      The quote appears to be from a real book of Islamic jurisprudence called “Tahrir al-Wasilah” (also known as “A Clarification of Questions”), but it’s presented in a profoundly misleading way. Khomeini states that sex with animals is punished and that repeated violations are punishable by execution – meaning it’s clearly forbidden (haram). The passage about what to do with the animal afterward is discussing the legal/ritual consequences IF such a forbidden act occurs, not giving permission for it.

    5. If a leader said they wanted their country to improve over time that prolly means they were chill cool guys

    6. “This goatfucker selling me his cummy mutton, but apparently that’s halal.”
      -some unfortunate Iranian villager in 1980

    7. Wait until you read Khomeini’s ruling on how to have sex with children who are too young for penetration.

    8. Are you fucking kidding me you think the shah of Iran is better? That mf kept torturing people using his terrorist intelligence agency the SAVAK, they tore fingernails, cracks testicles, pulled teeth on daily basis and called it torture.

      Cope and seethe

    9. Angryhippo2910 on

      I’ll tell ya one thing and I ain’t afraid to say it, my estimation of Ayatollah Khomeini as a man just fucking plummeted. To sell tainted meat to a neighbouring village? It’s fucking nauseating!

    10. GreenockScatman on

      I read Khomeini’s book where he goes on about what’s permissible and what isn’t, and it goes into great detail about stuff no sane person would ever care about. Such as if you pee on a roof, how long does it need to rain for it to wash away completely, or what kind of position you should assume to wipe your ass after taking a shit in the desert. I guess these were more practical concerns for people in 1970s Iran than whatever the Shah was talking about.

    11. TwoPossible4789 on

      I mean, say what you want about the shah, but his rule has got to be better than the islamic republic and by a long shot too.

    12. Suspicious-Capital12 on

      I could bring up a worst quote from his book Tahreer al-Waseelah:

      Issue #12: “It is not permissible to have sexual intercourse (with one’s wife) before she reaches 9 years in age, be it in Nikaah (permanent marriage) or Mut’a (temporary marriage). As for all other pleasures such as lustful touch, embracing, and thighing (i.e., rubbing penis between the thighs), there is no problem in it, even if she is a suckling baby.”

      https://www.leader.ir/ar/book/13?sn=6910

    13. Legal_Talk_3847 on

      “Uh, good to know, but the question was if it was Halal or Haram for a diabetic Muslim to consume hard candies to manage his blood sugar during Ramadan.” “Oh, that’s fine, anyway on the topic of Marsupials, it’s a little iffier, but…”

    14. 1984isAMidlifeCrisis on

      Meanwhile, the pastors and preachers of the Midwest just let their congregations do whatever they want to the animals they’re fucking. Cook ’em, sell ’em, whatever you want, no guidance.

    15. No-Passion1127 on

      “I shall advise you, as i advised the shah in this very school but he did not listen, but you all compared to the shah are worth nothing”

      -Khomenei

      This mf wasnt hiding anything. Iranians were just a retarted bunch for following him.

      Now its a joke in iran as “ Shoma ke chizi nistid”

    16. MildlyUpsetGerbil on

      I appreciate that you’re up front about agendaposting. People tend to be a bit evasive when doing so.

    17. No-Passion1127 on

      The Akhunds destroyed iran. These mfs go on tv and say how even if they leave they will burn Iran to the ground so hard that we wouldn’t be able to revive it for 100 years ( no fucking joke they said this)

      As an iranian i can assure you that no matter how flawed the shah was the mullah are 1 trillion times worse.

      Eventually an old man in iran who lived through both periods would completely agree.

      People who think otherwise have never actually been to iran or talked to an iranian.

      They turned a modernizing iran into Venezuela and idiots still cheer for them.

      As a kid My grandfather used to tell me stories of how with working in a Pepsi factory as a young-man he managed to get a tailor made suit with fancy shoes with only 2 months of pay and still have more than enough for the rest of the month.

      Now an Avarage iranian cant even dream of such a thing.

      -iranians back then were mentally ill and now most if not all of them know it but its too late.

      Don’t trust me? They are still alive, Just go ask them or their sons.

    18. You know you don’t have to misrepresent the Ayatollah to make him look bad, right? He’s a theocratic dictator of a third-world religious nightmare of a country. His actual words and actions are enough to hate him.

    19. Unfair_Dragonfruit49 on

      Classic Middle East: the choice is between a secular dictatorship or a religious dictatorship

    Leave A Reply