Man I know this dude was so much of an asshole, a writer had written an obituary for him before she herself died.
InAppropriate-meal on
She would of been credited but she died a couple of years before the nobel was awarded, by that stage of course he had already stolen her work (it was taken and shared without permission) and used it to discover the double helical nature of it.
Feisty-Honeydew-5309 on
Lemme research this so I can hate appropriately.
Unusual-Ideal-3509 on
Yup we gotta keep things on the ACTUALLY ACCURATE side of history cus these people are physically unwilling to tell the truth abt real blk achievements/history
Someone told me that the Henrietta Lacks story was a myth, I seriously can’t.
kkeut on
typically one sets the record straight through research and credible sources and not screenshots of a random anonymous tweet
Appropriate-Log8506 on
All my respect to Rosalind Franklin and no one else.
Powerblue102 on
So, anyways, the Democratic Party caved yet again even after landslide victories on Tuesday. In March they needed 10 to fold, so 10 folded. Yesterday they needed exactly 8 to fold, so 8 folded.
This is not the party that wants to defeat Trump, defeat the system that made Trump possible, or improve the lives of the American people.
We should prob talk about it in the comments of every other post since the post that do criticize the Democratic Party keep mysteriously getting taken down? Could the mods provide a reason why?
BallisWife on
Oh, shocker. 😒
BigRedSpoon2 on
… like he did steal her research, but most experts agree his and Crik’s work was primarily in the interpretation of the data. Everything else is still true, he was misogynistic racist ass who stole Franklin’s data, but acting like he had no hand in our modern understanding of DNA is to over simplify history.
This isn’t buried history either, I’ve yet to have had a bio course where, when the subject of DNA came up, this controversy went unmentioned either in class, or in the textbook.
9 Comments
Man I know this dude was so much of an asshole, a writer had written an obituary for him before she herself died.
She would of been credited but she died a couple of years before the nobel was awarded, by that stage of course he had already stolen her work (it was taken and shared without permission) and used it to discover the double helical nature of it.
Lemme research this so I can hate appropriately.
Yup we gotta keep things on the ACTUALLY ACCURATE side of history cus these people are physically unwilling to tell the truth abt real blk achievements/history
Someone told me that the Henrietta Lacks story was a myth, I seriously can’t.
typically one sets the record straight through research and credible sources and not screenshots of a random anonymous tweet
All my respect to Rosalind Franklin and no one else.
So, anyways, the Democratic Party caved yet again even after landslide victories on Tuesday. In March they needed 10 to fold, so 10 folded. Yesterday they needed exactly 8 to fold, so 8 folded.
This is not the party that wants to defeat Trump, defeat the system that made Trump possible, or improve the lives of the American people.
We should prob talk about it in the comments of every other post since the post that do criticize the Democratic Party keep mysteriously getting taken down? Could the mods provide a reason why?
Oh, shocker. 😒
… like he did steal her research, but most experts agree his and Crik’s work was primarily in the interpretation of the data. Everything else is still true, he was misogynistic racist ass who stole Franklin’s data, but acting like he had no hand in our modern understanding of DNA is to over simplify history.
This isn’t buried history either, I’ve yet to have had a bio course where, when the subject of DNA came up, this controversy went unmentioned either in class, or in the textbook.