Love Bad Religion getting a shout-out with their signature crossbuster
IndependentEmu7552 on
Imagine being so wrong you thing being Academic is a bias 🤦🏽♂️
ElToroGay on
Doesn’t MAGA claim to support “Western Values”?
Kapitano72 on
Oh noes! The experts don’t agree with us!
Hey I’ve got a great idea: Let’s call it “bias”!
WyomingCountryBoy on
Well, they are right, religion IS irrelevant.
Ben_Pharten on
Extreme right wing views are a disease on western society.
Malexs on
And just who is this butt-hurt conservative poster?
Whatever801 on
Definitely a bit too facts and truth oriented
blackbirdspyplane on
Then don’t use it
Rum_Hamtaro on
The United States of America was founded on maintaining a secular government. It’s a massive part of the identity of the US. If you have a problem with that, you can move to a different country.
swarlesbarkley_ on
Who woulda thought a site dedicated to providing info would have a bias toward academic sources!?
How crazy is that!!!?!
Accomplished_Note_81 on
“Four of the theses”…what?!
MostlyCarbon75 on
so…
Nationalist
Uneducated
Religious
Regressive
NURR! is the goal?
Worst. Encyclopedia. Ever.
oflowz on
Didnt these tools already make Conservapedia for all their batshittery?
Intelligent-Wear2824 on
Now that elon wants to create his version of wikipedia w/ grokipedia…I imagine will start seeing more anti-wikipedia propaganda and how woke it is.
HiroHayami on
Classic fascists trying to ban knowledge.
kontrol1970 on
Maga can use conservapedia if they are triggered. Yes it’s real.
VioletNocte on
God forbid (no pun intended) a website that exists purely for informational purposes for a wider audience stay neutral on the topic of religion
DrTenochtitlan on
The article has everything but the shocked Pikachu face. *gasp*
pinniped90 on
Yeah, fuck Wikipedia, we need more nationalist, uneducated, fundamentalist Christian, homophobic platforms!!
Oh wait, that’s X…
Never mind.
carlitobrigantehf on
Progressive, as opposed to regressive?
Do these people even know what words mean
drillgorg on
The infographic feels AI generated
Im_tracer_bullet on
In other words, they want to live in an alternate reality where science, data, and unambiguous facts are irrelevant, all answers are to be found in a book of adult fairy tales, and people should be governed accordingly.
I’m sure all theocracies would think that way…
No_Party5870 on
This dude needs a dictionary not an encyclopedia.
gwdope on
Could have just said “reality” biased.
Fleiger133 on
Encyclopedia Brittanica is apparently woke. Who knew.
Crazy-Finger-4185 on
Him: Wikipedia is bad because academics.
Also Him: Here are four theses on how to correct that.
Dude…
ShrimpCrackers on
I’ve never seen a group of people that have such a big inferiority complex for being undereducated. And the “Globalist” and “Pushes Elite Western views” yeah this is some Russian bait. Same fucks that accidentally type 500$ when talking about money.
bellapippin on
Can someone give me a bit more context on how these people use the word “globalist” and use it as something bad? First, how would it be “western views” if it’s globalist? Isn’t that an oxymoron/contradictory?
Lol at the other three. Also, “elite” universities? So like just ivy leagues?
29 Comments
Love Bad Religion getting a shout-out with their signature crossbuster
Imagine being so wrong you thing being Academic is a bias 🤦🏽♂️
Doesn’t MAGA claim to support “Western Values”?
Oh noes! The experts don’t agree with us!
Hey I’ve got a great idea: Let’s call it “bias”!
Well, they are right, religion IS irrelevant.
Extreme right wing views are a disease on western society.
And just who is this butt-hurt conservative poster?
Definitely a bit too facts and truth oriented
Then don’t use it
The United States of America was founded on maintaining a secular government. It’s a massive part of the identity of the US. If you have a problem with that, you can move to a different country.
Who woulda thought a site dedicated to providing info would have a bias toward academic sources!?
How crazy is that!!!?!
“Four of the theses”…what?!
so…
Nationalist
Uneducated
Religious
Regressive
NURR! is the goal?
Worst. Encyclopedia. Ever.
Didnt these tools already make Conservapedia for all their batshittery?
Now that elon wants to create his version of wikipedia w/ grokipedia…I imagine will start seeing more anti-wikipedia propaganda and how woke it is.
Classic fascists trying to ban knowledge.
Maga can use conservapedia if they are triggered. Yes it’s real.
God forbid (no pun intended) a website that exists purely for informational purposes for a wider audience stay neutral on the topic of religion
The article has everything but the shocked Pikachu face. *gasp*
Yeah, fuck Wikipedia, we need more nationalist, uneducated, fundamentalist Christian, homophobic platforms!!
Oh wait, that’s X…
Never mind.
Progressive, as opposed to regressive?
Do these people even know what words mean
The infographic feels AI generated
In other words, they want to live in an alternate reality where science, data, and unambiguous facts are irrelevant, all answers are to be found in a book of adult fairy tales, and people should be governed accordingly.
I’m sure all theocracies would think that way…
This dude needs a dictionary not an encyclopedia.
Could have just said “reality” biased.
Encyclopedia Brittanica is apparently woke. Who knew.
Him: Wikipedia is bad because academics.
Also Him: Here are four theses on how to correct that.
Dude…
I’ve never seen a group of people that have such a big inferiority complex for being undereducated. And the “Globalist” and “Pushes Elite Western views” yeah this is some Russian bait. Same fucks that accidentally type 500$ when talking about money.
Can someone give me a bit more context on how these people use the word “globalist” and use it as something bad? First, how would it be “western views” if it’s globalist? Isn’t that an oxymoron/contradictory?
Lol at the other three. Also, “elite” universities? So like just ivy leagues?