Yes, an attorney. With a law degree. On the highest court in the land. In a lifetime position.
Thinks
Laws don’t matter.
Remove and disbar the fucking idiot.
_Zetetic on
He looks bored, probably too slow to sexually assault anyone and not dead yet so still a supreme Court judge somehow
wiremupi on
Size of the bribe takes precedent.
DocBanner21 on
Hell no. We should definitely let Plessy and Dred Scott stand! You can’t ignore precedent!
IsThereCheese on
Nothing fucking matters anymore right
Tr3sp4ss3r on
That’s stating the obvious, and should;d be past tense, They overturned roe vs Wade. Thats about as “Precedent doesn’t matter’ as you can get.
No, wait, they are going to try worse.
SupaPatt on
bribes determine cases
Earcandy70 on
Traitor
blinkanboxcar182 on
The next stage of project 2025 is to dismantle the court system as we know it. Right on track.
People are being ripped from their families by masked agents, sent to concentration camps, and disappearing.
Just because it doesn’t affect your daily life doesn’t mean we aren’t reliving Nazi Germany in real time.
Don’t think this will all go away and we’ll be back to normal once ____ (midterms shift, Trump dies or no longer is in office, etc.). Most of what has already happened is irreparable. The US is no longer a trusted nation on the world stage and that’s not coming back any time soon.
Until the comfortable middle class starts actively taking to the streets, this will continue. Don’t watch in sadness and say nothing. Start by being vocal on your opposition to what’s happening – even if it’s just a Facebook post. Start making it acceptable to speak up and speak out. Then organize rallies and protests – or when they’re organized by others, participate in them.
We’re rapidly losing our country.
Hemiak on
President > precedent for the current administration.
Saint909 on
You mean Clearance Thomas.
Aiku on
Well, we already have a president that’s becoming increasingly irrelevant…
Beyond_Re-Animator on
‘We’re just gonna make it up as we go.’
Mulliganasty on
This would have made my Constitutional Law finals so much easier.
Objectionne on
I just went and found the actual article and read the quote and he pretty much seems to be saying “we shouldn’t defer to precedent dogmatically, we should consider how the precedent was set and whether it still makes sense”.
Does anybody actually disagree?
Beer-astronaut on
Malignant, corrupt, petty and incompetent. Way to go you dumb jackass.
gdawg01 on
This has been the way the SCOTUS has worked since Citizens United.
simpsonicus90 on
The Constitution doesn’t even determine cases. Hell, since Bush v Gore in 2000.
scottywoty on
What happened to every justice who was interviewed to be awarded their seat saying precedent was solid and real?
DonKaeo on
“What’s in it for me…?”
External_Demand_8839 on
We need a Constitutional amendment limiting SCOTUS to 20 year terms. Bury this old fucking Uncle Tom already!
therealtiddlydump on
This has been his position on precedent since he was nominated. This is not news.
_He’s written this in dissents for over 30 years!_
heumpje on
As a non-native speaker, i always have to retrace and make sure that it reads ‘precedent’, not ‘president’.
panonarian on
If any of you criticize him, you’re racist.
Joey_BagaDonuts57 on
For Clarence and clarity:
“**Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” —Martin Luther King, Jr.**
Sunnothere on
So his judgements will most definetly never be considered in the future.
Big-ol-wookie on
It doesn’t matter when anything can be on a shadow docket. Why waste time saying why your rulings have any legal reasoning behind them at all?
Sorry_Nobody1552 on
Everyday is one more kick in the balls of the people.
snarkyanon on
Wtf are they paying and/or do they have on this man? What a disgrace
coolchris366 on
I hope he’s happy about being discarded when he’s no longer useful, like Ramaswamy. Anyone remember him?
Manji86 on
I mean we’ve had a new precedent the as soon as Barrett was sworn in a month before the election. New Precedents:
– SCOTUS no longer represents the people
– Do harm
– Serve the will of Donald Trump
– Impose your version of Christianity on all citizens
31 Comments
Yes, an attorney. With a law degree. On the highest court in the land. In a lifetime position.
Thinks
Laws don’t matter.
Remove and disbar the fucking idiot.
He looks bored, probably too slow to sexually assault anyone and not dead yet so still a supreme Court judge somehow
Size of the bribe takes precedent.
Hell no. We should definitely let Plessy and Dred Scott stand! You can’t ignore precedent!
Nothing fucking matters anymore right
That’s stating the obvious, and should;d be past tense, They overturned roe vs Wade. Thats about as “Precedent doesn’t matter’ as you can get.
No, wait, they are going to try worse.
bribes determine cases
Traitor
The next stage of project 2025 is to dismantle the court system as we know it. Right on track.
https://www.project2025.observer/en
People are being ripped from their families by masked agents, sent to concentration camps, and disappearing.
Just because it doesn’t affect your daily life doesn’t mean we aren’t reliving Nazi Germany in real time.
Don’t think this will all go away and we’ll be back to normal once ____ (midterms shift, Trump dies or no longer is in office, etc.). Most of what has already happened is irreparable. The US is no longer a trusted nation on the world stage and that’s not coming back any time soon.
Until the comfortable middle class starts actively taking to the streets, this will continue. Don’t watch in sadness and say nothing. Start by being vocal on your opposition to what’s happening – even if it’s just a Facebook post. Start making it acceptable to speak up and speak out. Then organize rallies and protests – or when they’re organized by others, participate in them.
We’re rapidly losing our country.
President > precedent for the current administration.
You mean Clearance Thomas.
Well, we already have a president that’s becoming increasingly irrelevant…
‘We’re just gonna make it up as we go.’
This would have made my Constitutional Law finals so much easier.
I just went and found the actual article and read the quote and he pretty much seems to be saying “we shouldn’t defer to precedent dogmatically, we should consider how the precedent was set and whether it still makes sense”.
Does anybody actually disagree?
Malignant, corrupt, petty and incompetent. Way to go you dumb jackass.
This has been the way the SCOTUS has worked since Citizens United.
The Constitution doesn’t even determine cases. Hell, since Bush v Gore in 2000.
What happened to every justice who was interviewed to be awarded their seat saying precedent was solid and real?
“What’s in it for me…?”
We need a Constitutional amendment limiting SCOTUS to 20 year terms. Bury this old fucking Uncle Tom already!
This has been his position on precedent since he was nominated. This is not news.
_He’s written this in dissents for over 30 years!_
As a non-native speaker, i always have to retrace and make sure that it reads ‘precedent’, not ‘president’.
If any of you criticize him, you’re racist.
For Clarence and clarity:
“**Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” —Martin Luther King, Jr.**
So his judgements will most definetly never be considered in the future.
It doesn’t matter when anything can be on a shadow docket. Why waste time saying why your rulings have any legal reasoning behind them at all?
Everyday is one more kick in the balls of the people.
Wtf are they paying and/or do they have on this man? What a disgrace
I hope he’s happy about being discarded when he’s no longer useful, like Ramaswamy. Anyone remember him?
I mean we’ve had a new precedent the as soon as Barrett was sworn in a month before the election. New Precedents:
– SCOTUS no longer represents the people
– Do harm
– Serve the will of Donald Trump
– Impose your version of Christianity on all citizens