it might, but thanks to the US court system it’ll likely be kicked around in court for a few more months before SCOTUS kills it.
Halfwise2 on
I wonder if a judge could say “The use of National Guard is illegal, and any further action will be treated as if performed by a private civilian.”
AKA, any public response would be judged as if they were responding to whatever random Joe performed the action, instead of ‘The National Guard”.
Mygoddamreddit on
Any pushback is good pushback.
WordNERD37 on
The fact you don’t means you’ve accepted the country has fallen. They won the battle with barely a issue if your reaction is first and foremost, it doesn’t matter.
Jeff_the_orc on
V2xj6 b bng
14 erb x x
hammilithome on
Will this kick off some big lawsuits against the fed for illegal arrests and searches and detainments?
dracoquin on
It sets precedent for when he tries it again in Chicago.
andrefishmusic on
Ilegal but let them stay there, just because.
GadreelsSword on
*“Judge has no one to enforce his decision. Trump laughs, News at 11.”*
All joking aside, did you see the Philly DA said they’re considering arresting ICE employees and the National Guard for violating Philadelphia law? Then added they will be outside Trump’s authority to pardon them.
JIFFFF624 on
Yeah, it’s already done. It’s how he gets away with everything. Oh, I can’t do that? TOo LaTe.
WistfulWanderings on
Is assuming court orders don’t matter just another form of obeying in advance?
Asking for a friend
BenMullen2 on
No . the SCOTUS already ruled that any act that is an “official act” can be done without recourse if by a president.
its illegality is immaterial.
The SCOTUS ruling made us an autocrasy overnight and I think it will take people a bit to realize that.
BluFaerie on
I mean he’s just ignored the courts before. I think that guy is still in El Salvador.
Bawbawian on
it’s like when they tell you you are protected by the Constitution but a man with an assault rifle can come and yank you out of your home and shoot your dog and maybe you and not even have the right house or any of the rights to do any of the things he’s done.
Strict-Square456 on
“Judges? We dont need no stinking judges. “
townmorron on
He hasn’t followed laws in 20 years
glinkenheimer on
Your proposed alternative is what? Everyone give up? Because anytime there is even minuscule pushback to authoritarianism, people come out of the woodwork saying “this won’t do anything” and it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. That only benefits the people who agree with how our government is getting fucked up.
patchbaystray on
It doesn’t mean much because of the absolute immunity that the Scotus gave him. However, that doesn’t stop CA from suing the commanders and troops that obeyed the unlawful order.
chi_guy8 on
It’s valuable in the sense that it’s a receipt the Dems should hold on to when they take back house, senate, WH and want to disregard the 2nd amendment to curb the senseless killing of school children.
ramriot on
A pattern of lawless behaviour can be used itself to challenge the ongoing acceptance as legal, further executive orders. At that point you have a constitutional crisis & possible calls to secede.
Guntcher_1423 on
Does this mean they can be arrested by the police there?
Makers402 on
We’re on the brink of losing our Republic to historically stupid person.
foxx_grey on
Forreal. I saw the news headline and immediately thought “now do something about it. Bet you won’t”
ghallway on
Epstein EpsteinEpstein bananafana bo Bepstein
Squirrel_Inner on
Are you not aware of future plans? Do you understand the concept of legal precedent?
el0_0le on
Don’t drink the nihilism, buddy.

naththegrath10 on
Exactly!
feder_online on
It matters for two reasons. First, because the use of force has been deemed illegal, soldiers are now free to ignore the orders to invade a state; any consequence to the soldiers for not carrying out the illegal order becomes a liability to those making the order and/or the armed forces.
Second, because the order to invade a state is illegal, those soldiers still doing it could be prosecuted at the federal or state level. Because the order itself would be illegal, it would vitiate POTUS “immunity” on both a state and federal level.
YMMV…I am not a lawyer and do not play one on TV.
sixaout1982 on
It might matter in the aftermath, when sane people take back power and trump’s minions face the consequences of their actions
29 Comments
it might, but thanks to the US court system it’ll likely be kicked around in court for a few more months before SCOTUS kills it.
I wonder if a judge could say “The use of National Guard is illegal, and any further action will be treated as if performed by a private civilian.”
AKA, any public response would be judged as if they were responding to whatever random Joe performed the action, instead of ‘The National Guard”.
Any pushback is good pushback.
The fact you don’t means you’ve accepted the country has fallen. They won the battle with barely a issue if your reaction is first and foremost, it doesn’t matter.
V2xj6 b bng
14 erb x x
Will this kick off some big lawsuits against the fed for illegal arrests and searches and detainments?
It sets precedent for when he tries it again in Chicago.
Ilegal but let them stay there, just because.
*“Judge has no one to enforce his decision. Trump laughs, News at 11.”*
All joking aside, did you see the Philly DA said they’re considering arresting ICE employees and the National Guard for violating Philadelphia law? Then added they will be outside Trump’s authority to pardon them.
Yeah, it’s already done. It’s how he gets away with everything. Oh, I can’t do that? TOo LaTe.
Is assuming court orders don’t matter just another form of obeying in advance?
Asking for a friend
No . the SCOTUS already ruled that any act that is an “official act” can be done without recourse if by a president.
its illegality is immaterial.
The SCOTUS ruling made us an autocrasy overnight and I think it will take people a bit to realize that.
I mean he’s just ignored the courts before. I think that guy is still in El Salvador.
it’s like when they tell you you are protected by the Constitution but a man with an assault rifle can come and yank you out of your home and shoot your dog and maybe you and not even have the right house or any of the rights to do any of the things he’s done.
“Judges? We dont need no stinking judges. “
He hasn’t followed laws in 20 years
Your proposed alternative is what? Everyone give up? Because anytime there is even minuscule pushback to authoritarianism, people come out of the woodwork saying “this won’t do anything” and it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. That only benefits the people who agree with how our government is getting fucked up.
It doesn’t mean much because of the absolute immunity that the Scotus gave him. However, that doesn’t stop CA from suing the commanders and troops that obeyed the unlawful order.
It’s valuable in the sense that it’s a receipt the Dems should hold on to when they take back house, senate, WH and want to disregard the 2nd amendment to curb the senseless killing of school children.
A pattern of lawless behaviour can be used itself to challenge the ongoing acceptance as legal, further executive orders. At that point you have a constitutional crisis & possible calls to secede.
Does this mean they can be arrested by the police there?
We’re on the brink of losing our Republic to historically stupid person.
Forreal. I saw the news headline and immediately thought “now do something about it. Bet you won’t”
Epstein EpsteinEpstein bananafana bo Bepstein
Are you not aware of future plans? Do you understand the concept of legal precedent?
Don’t drink the nihilism, buddy.

Exactly!
It matters for two reasons. First, because the use of force has been deemed illegal, soldiers are now free to ignore the orders to invade a state; any consequence to the soldiers for not carrying out the illegal order becomes a liability to those making the order and/or the armed forces.
Second, because the order to invade a state is illegal, those soldiers still doing it could be prosecuted at the federal or state level. Because the order itself would be illegal, it would vitiate POTUS “immunity” on both a state and federal level.
YMMV…I am not a lawyer and do not play one on TV.
It might matter in the aftermath, when sane people take back power and trump’s minions face the consequences of their actions