Does this take into account that cannabis and mushrooms had their classes changed during this period, I’m mainly thinking mushrooms whihc went from class C to A.
CleverNameThing on
I think this phenomena was already revealed in the rat park study. Glad to see it demonstrated in humans. Here’s a thought: let’s stop criminalizing drug use.
CyberSkepticalFruit on
Your last slide claims that drugs are a low income “thing” but your own results show that it more accurate to say there is a dip between those earning ~£30-50K, with those earning more are just as likely if not more likely to use certain drugs then those earning under £20k.
Trimax42 on
Now the question is, are people using drugs because they are unhappy, are they unhappy because they use drugs or (as I would guess) is it a mixture of both.
generalvostok on
Except for amphetamines, apparently. 10% tweakers across the board.
voxpopper on
What is being classified as “drugs”? Alcohol, Adderall? Zoloft? GLP-1 antagonists?
I presume you mean illegal or illicit substances.
Also, can you point me to data source for National average?
thx
whiteyak41 on
In related news: Hungry people far more likely to eat.
Effective_Image_86 on
I wonder if the second picture speaks to the younger generation being more open about drugs than the previous, rather than actually doing more drugs
Marchello_E on
That stuff just causes a feedback loop. At some point correlation becomes causal.
Something to think about: Same will happen when people who use social media for “the likes” stop using it (Like for example, out of principle because it requires ID for age purposes) and get dopamine withdrawal. Be aware / take care when finding yourself replacing it with an alternative.
Tripton1 on
I looked at every chart before noticing the pound sterling symbol and realizing that none of this means anything on this side of the pond. Lol
Easy to understand though.
Amerlan on
The fact that people with high happiness use more than medium is an interesting bit that shouldn’t be ignored.
epanek on
Counterpoint taking drugs brings new meaning for how happy Is happy exactly and exposing that our lives are usually quite poor.
magereaper on
Studies suggest that water might be wet, experts says.
Appropriate_Mixer on
I would like to see this for the US. I feel like some things would be different
blanketshapes on
where are people who make less than 10k getting ketamine?
nathrek on
Drugs are definitely not a low income thing.Â
ClemRRay on
The title of the 4th graph is wrong I think
RX3000 on
Now do the data on grass being green & the sky being blue please. I need a chart to show me 🤣
moral_luck on
Do unhappy people take drugs or does taking drugs make people unhappy?
roger_enright on
It’s missing alcohol. The largest drug of abuse is excluded from the data? For real?
TheAstroidIsComing on
Another vague win for LSD…happy and miserable people alike seem to be using it.
Best drug ever.
Vellioh on
Studies show that hungry people eat more than people that aren’t hungry.
TheAstroidIsComing on
There were some of us who assumed that free access to information (via the internet) about the good drugs such as LSD and Mushrooms would have seen a massive upsurge in their use.
There was a phase online around 2010 when everyone was on about Ayahuasca and the psychedelic revolution.
It seems to have passed. Which for those who believe in those drugs and their power to transform individuals and society in positive ways is disappointing.
The new opiate of the masses: smartphones.
muchgreaterthanG_O_D on
I love tha Cocaine is what high and low income have in common.
mxred420 on
I take issue with your graph summaries.
>unhappy people are far more likely to take drugs
From the outset, the correlation youre drawing this from isnt consistent. Amphetamines make no impact and ecstasy use has a positive correlation.
But the data shows only that – correlations. The relationship between drugs and happiness could be inverted, in that drugs make people unhappier. Or perhaps its a spurious connection; dont inflate the meaning of the data.
>drugs look easier to find
The data doesnt like that to me. The “dont know” group seems to increase but you need to calculate statistical differences in the response changes to make this sort of claim scientifically. Also, its weird to have such a stark range in responses, either “impossible” or “really easy”; there really should be intermediates like “likely” or probably not”.
>Drugs are kind of a low income thing
False again, as the data shows that some drugs are correlated with the highest salaries. Perhaps individuals with incomes are more likely to be surrounded by drugs. The way you phrase this make it seem like poor people are seeking out drugs more.
There are so many societal factors and research limitations that youre neglecting by presenting with such claims. The data is great, but dont aggrandise.
28 Comments
Charts made with matplotlib in Python. Data comes from the Crime Survey for England and Wales. [https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/drugmisuseinenglandandwalesappendixtable](https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/drugmisuseinenglandandwalesappendixtable)
Does this take into account that cannabis and mushrooms had their classes changed during this period, I’m mainly thinking mushrooms whihc went from class C to A.
I think this phenomena was already revealed in the rat park study. Glad to see it demonstrated in humans. Here’s a thought: let’s stop criminalizing drug use.
Your last slide claims that drugs are a low income “thing” but your own results show that it more accurate to say there is a dip between those earning ~£30-50K, with those earning more are just as likely if not more likely to use certain drugs then those earning under £20k.
Now the question is, are people using drugs because they are unhappy, are they unhappy because they use drugs or (as I would guess) is it a mixture of both.
Except for amphetamines, apparently. 10% tweakers across the board.
What is being classified as “drugs”? Alcohol, Adderall? Zoloft? GLP-1 antagonists?
I presume you mean illegal or illicit substances.
Also, can you point me to data source for National average?
thx
In related news: Hungry people far more likely to eat.
I wonder if the second picture speaks to the younger generation being more open about drugs than the previous, rather than actually doing more drugs
That stuff just causes a feedback loop. At some point correlation becomes causal.
Something to think about: Same will happen when people who use social media for “the likes” stop using it (Like for example, out of principle because it requires ID for age purposes) and get dopamine withdrawal. Be aware / take care when finding yourself replacing it with an alternative.
I looked at every chart before noticing the pound sterling symbol and realizing that none of this means anything on this side of the pond. Lol
Easy to understand though.
The fact that people with high happiness use more than medium is an interesting bit that shouldn’t be ignored.
Counterpoint taking drugs brings new meaning for how happy Is happy exactly and exposing that our lives are usually quite poor.
Studies suggest that water might be wet, experts says.
I would like to see this for the US. I feel like some things would be different
where are people who make less than 10k getting ketamine?
Drugs are definitely not a low income thing.Â
The title of the 4th graph is wrong I think
Now do the data on grass being green & the sky being blue please. I need a chart to show me 🤣
Do unhappy people take drugs or does taking drugs make people unhappy?
It’s missing alcohol. The largest drug of abuse is excluded from the data? For real?
Another vague win for LSD…happy and miserable people alike seem to be using it.
Best drug ever.
Studies show that hungry people eat more than people that aren’t hungry.
There were some of us who assumed that free access to information (via the internet) about the good drugs such as LSD and Mushrooms would have seen a massive upsurge in their use.
There was a phase online around 2010 when everyone was on about Ayahuasca and the psychedelic revolution.
It seems to have passed. Which for those who believe in those drugs and their power to transform individuals and society in positive ways is disappointing.
The new opiate of the masses: smartphones.
I love tha Cocaine is what high and low income have in common.
I take issue with your graph summaries.
>unhappy people are far more likely to take drugs
From the outset, the correlation youre drawing this from isnt consistent. Amphetamines make no impact and ecstasy use has a positive correlation.
But the data shows only that – correlations. The relationship between drugs and happiness could be inverted, in that drugs make people unhappier. Or perhaps its a spurious connection; dont inflate the meaning of the data.
>drugs look easier to find
The data doesnt like that to me. The “dont know” group seems to increase but you need to calculate statistical differences in the response changes to make this sort of claim scientifically. Also, its weird to have such a stark range in responses, either “impossible” or “really easy”; there really should be intermediates like “likely” or probably not”.
>Drugs are kind of a low income thing
False again, as the data shows that some drugs are correlated with the highest salaries. Perhaps individuals with incomes are more likely to be surrounded by drugs. The way you phrase this make it seem like poor people are seeking out drugs more.
There are so many societal factors and research limitations that youre neglecting by presenting with such claims. The data is great, but dont aggrandise.
Does alcohol count as a drug?
Nice to finally be an outlier.
Happy, High income and social drug user.