1931 concept of Depthscrapers

    by Chaunc2020

    29 Comments

    1. Fun fact – it’s easier going down stairs in an emergency instead of up them. Fire also climbs.

      Building below ground is uniquely challenging in a lot of respects.

      I wonder at what depth you start going backwards in geotherm…

    2. AT&T built a 7 story underground building for a major switching center. It was built in the late 1950s or early 60s when there was concern about nuclear war since it was near NYC, a presumed target. No one wanted to work below the generators and batteries that ran it, so the batteries went in the 7th level below ground and the generators went in the 6th. Switching equipment went in the intermediate levels and offices were in the top levels.

      The site was located in Upper Saddle RIVER, NJ. The name of the town is important – it was in the flood plain of the Upper Saddle River.

      One day, the river overflowed its banks and the switching center was sunk. Literally and figuratively.

    3. bongohappypants on

      I’m not a handsome optical scientician, but because they used a parabolic mirror the folks on the third floor are in for a rough day as their cement floors, appliances, and pets all become molten with the power of our friend, the Sun!

    4. This makes me think of the Wool series of books. I think it was made into a television series called Silo.

    5. Look I know there’s severe problems in this concept but imagine we worked it out and had a surface city of 90% plants, and then these holes that were the ‘actual’ city… you could take the elevator up and be in the middle of a forest essentially if we could work out the problems of getting everyone sunlight and yah know safety and all that boring stuff

    6. Training-Pipe-4726 on

      Good thing they didn’t lean into this idea or the tsunami after the earthquake would have been even more deadly.

    7. Deep_Working1 on

      Why have I not seen a SINGLE Fallout reference ?

      C’mon people, its RIGHT THERE !

    Leave A Reply