You Don’t Need A Translation

    by Reasonable-Deer8343

    9 Comments

    1. Far_Ladder_2836 on

      Marxism-Leninism.  Leninism sure.  Marxism is stateless and classless.

      I’d argue with the totalitarian powers given to Mao, it was much closer to Stalinism.  Nowadays… it’s complicated.  I doubt vast international super-corps like Tencent and Alibaba were what Lenin was writing about even if they’re largely state owned.

    2. Narco_Marcion1075 on

      tbf, I don’t think trying to incorporate central asian and caucasian states was much less hypocritical

    3. King_Of_BlackMarsh on

      Did Lenin allow people to just secede? Genuine question because I distinctly remember that not being the case

    4. Yes the fuck we do need a translation lmao, this is even more egregious than the usual where posters here assume everyone is specialized in the exact same time period and location as them and doesnt need context. This one i not only need context of who this is abiut but i need the literal meaning of whatever im supposed to be more specifically confused about

    5. Ehhhh, Taiwan was occupied by the Kuomintang in a bitter loser mindset after they lost the civil war. We have historical precedent for lands unjustly taken to be taken back (the ukrainian and belarussian lands occupied by the polish before WWII that the soviet union took back under Stalin). Coercive Unification of Taiwan could just be considered finishing what the civil war had started, imo as a marxist-leninist.

    Leave A Reply