I see nothing wrong with that

    by itscolossal

    42 Comments

    1. I’m fine with this. Also let’s start the new year in spring and everyone takes the winter months off to hibernate

    2. This requires New Year’s Day not being a day of the week and Mid-summer’s day replaces Leap Days, also not a day of the week.

    3. Dry_Discount83 on

      13×28+1=365. So every year we need one leap day, and two leaps inevery 4 years. But this still makes a lot sense. We still could not align calender permanenty wit cycle of moon.

    4. There have been arguments for this kind of calendar for centuries. Without some sort of World Government it’ll probably never happen. There is just way too much … everything… invested in the current system.

      It’s like one of the reasons the US keeps shooting down switching to Metric is that no one wants to pay to replace the what? Millions? Of speed limit signs across the country.

    5. _Hello_Hi_Hey_ on

      The year is based on the Earth’s orbit around the Sun (~365.25 days), not the moon’s cycles. 12 months aligns better with the seasons, whereas a 13-month, 28-day system totals only 364 days, requiring an extra “blank” day to keep up with the solar year.

      Twelve is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6, making it convenient for dividing the year into quarters, halves, and quarters for financial or business purposes.

    6. Almost, that would be 364 days a year, while we have about 365.25 days a year.

      We could compensate without wrecking the calendar by having a leap week every 6 years, and by skipping it once every 84 years.

      Time is like that though.

    7. I’m 100% in favor of this. And there would just be one leap day at the end of the year. Just have it not be any day of the week. It’s just its own thing.

    8. lil_literalist on

      Easier to divide with 12.months. Our year has quarters, even though they are not exactly the same. It also has thirds. And the ability to have half a year and know exactly what that means is invaluable.

    9. Nah fuck that. Im not going to risk being the fucking dude who’s birthday is forever on a monday.

    10. Okay but only if you’re okay with drifting seasons…. One year winter is in feb, the next year it’s July, so on and so forth…

    11. GoopInThisBowlIsVile on

      I would only sign on to this if the new month was called Smarch. It would give me a legit reason to reference a thirty year old Simpsons episode by saying, “Brrr! Oh, lousy Smarch weather.” It would also allow for scheduling a meeting at the 13th hour of the 13th day, of the 13th month to discuss calendars.

    12. I remember back when we had 10. We called the 8th month October, like octopus and octagon. The tenth month was December, like decimal and decade. Then Julius and Augustus decided they wanted months for themselves in the Summer and fucked everything up.

    13. This means that your birthday falls on the same day of the week every year, and if you’re Monday baby, sucks for you

    14. Doesn’t quite work… 13 months x 28 days/month = 364 days. A year is 365

      You would need 1 extra day every year, 2 extra days every leap year.

      The extra day(s) would have to be independent days from the rest of the year to maintain the 1st of the month staying on mondays… other wise everything would offset by one day every year (by two on leap years) like it does now.

    Leave A Reply