The reason they keep winning is they have no consistency to their morals or principles other than they will ditch or wield them at their own convenience to do anything to win.
Whereas the “other side” generally cares about having some sense of a moral code.
toomuchtostop on
Yet another reminder of why I left Twitter
_PM_ME_YOUR_FORESKIN on
Can someone please provide context?
AmeliaEarhartsPlane on
They are all snowflakes ❄️
NewToHTX on
Those *All Lives Matter* folks being really quiet right now for some odd reason.
slowlikemusic on
She was definitely far more successful, talented, and loved than either of these people
PeanutOrganic9174 on
Fuck C Kirk
farhadJuve on
Twitter is all bots now. It got old real quick
flipnonymous on
Or compare this to Babbit, as though trespassing and participating in a coup attempt is even in the same REALM as attempting to drive away from armed, masked possibly kidnappers, ICE, “special” forces, etc.
So not following KNOWN rules, laws, and repeated commands from officers, and refusing to willingly submit to armed, unidentified individuals is sooo similar to them, that the latter is worse somehow?
smellslikebadussy on
*quoted Charlie Kirk verbatim, but, like, disapprovingly
leatherpantsgod on
It’s absolutely fascinating how these people’s minds bend and curve in the most predictably stupid way possible.
Mean_Veterinarian688 on
something devastating needs to happen to these people. like how are they so devoid of empathy
steeveedeez on
It’s crazy how not even white lives matter to the all lives matter crowd.
derpferd on
It’s time to stop engaging with these motherfuckers like they have something worth engaging with.
Long past that time.
That engagement legitimatizes them.
Stop giving these motherfuckers legitamisation they don’t deserve and desperately crave.
Stop engaging with them. Walk away because they’re not worth it
strik3r2k8 on
They didn’t even give a shit about Kirk, only pimping his death to justify an excuse for violence.
Shido_Ohtori on
The *sole* value of conservatism is respect for and obedience to [one’s perception of] traditionally established hierarchy, and hierarchy dictates that those on top (in-groups) are rightfully idolized and receive privileges, credibility, and resources, while those on the bottom (out-groups) are demonized/dehumanized and/or bound by restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources.
To them, the second-greatest injustice imaginable is for those [they perceive to be] on the bottom [of social hierarchy] to have access to the rights, credibility, and resources reserved for those on top. The first greatest injustice is for those on top to be bound by the restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources reserved for those on the bottom.
[Conservatism](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservatism) — by definition — is “a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, **stressing the importance of established hierarchies and institutions** (such as religion, the family, **and class structure**), and preferring gradual development to abrupt change”.
>Rational conservatives maintain that a community with a **hierarchy of authority is most conducive to human well-being**.
>Confucius is another possible precursor. […] **his stress on authority and hierarchy prefigures central conservative themes**.
>With the Enlightenment, the natural order or **social hierarchy, previously largely accepted, was questioned**.
Western conservatism is a product from the Age of Enlightenment — specifically, a [Counter-Enlightenment](https://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/i7705.pdf), [a reactionary challenge to Humanism](https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/counter-enlightenment/). Its philosophers *rejected* a society governed by logic and reason, human rights and dignity, science and democracy, as its ideology *solely appeal* to the authority of traditionally established hierarchies.
>Burke shocked his contemporaries by insisting with brutal frankness that **“illusions” and “prejudices” are socially necessary**. He believed that most **human beings are innately depraved, steeped in original sin, and unable to better themselves with their feeble reason**. Better, he said, to rely on the “latent wisdom” of prejudice, which accumulates slowly through the years, than to “put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason.” **Among such prejudices are those that favour an established church and a landed aristocracy**; members of the latter, according to Burke, are the “great oaks” and “proper chieftains” of society, provided that they temper their rule with a spirit of timely reform and remain within the constitutional framework.
Conservatives absolutely need an underclass [for society] to demonize and dehumanize in order to maintain [their] hierarchy, and every single one of their policies and rhetoric work to do exactly that. Every right-wing accusation is a confession — every single one; always! — because it is never *the act itself* that upsets them, but rather, the *social standing* of the person doing the act, as said act is a privilege meant for those on top of [their perceived] hierarchy (See also: pedophilia – Trump and Catholic church vs. LGBTQ+ and drag queens).
>[Radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2122593119)
Violence is a tool meant for those on top to use upon those on the bottom to ensure the latter’s submission and obedience, and *never* vice versa. “Know your place” is their mantra.
HeadDiver5568 on
Ong. I brought this up earlier, but they were literally hollering, snotting, and turning red crying over that man. Calling the left animals, then do stuff like this. They wanted us to condemn violence even though we had no idea if the guy was even left or right, then IMMEDIATELY went after HBCUs. These people just straight up hate America and anyone else that isn’t licking boots
ILeftMyBurnerOn on
To be fair, Briahna Joy Gray is an idiot, sooooooooooooooooo
TheMagicalMatt on
Imagine naming your account Hugh Retard and thinking the world absolutely has to hear what you have to say about anything.
I don’t even know what the hell Ronald Dregan is supposed to mean, but naming yourself after one of, if not THE most infamous corporate leg-humping politicians in our history (pre-2016 anyway) tells me they don’t have much brain activity going on either.
Overall, of course a couple of rabid nazis bring nothing of value to the table. Afterall, they’re only here because their dad fucked a pig, and he only did that because he confused it for his sister.
your_not_stubborn on
Brianna Joy Gray told people to not vote for Kamala Harris.
pvtguerra on
Wtaf
Hunter-Gatherer_ on
They laugh at other peoples pain which is why I laugh at theirs! Fuck Charlie Kirk and his baby teeth.
Shingorillaz on
They’re calling a White mother a domestic terrorist if that doesn’t show non white maga that they’ll never be one of the good ones nothing will.
24 Comments
hey hey djt, what was the age of your last rapee.
[https://youtu.be/TRZa_cVshcI?si=I4a0YuMLZDnjTKDu&t=1346](https://youtu.be/TRZa_cVshcI?si=I4a0YuMLZDnjTKDu&t=1346)
The reason they keep winning is they have no consistency to their morals or principles other than they will ditch or wield them at their own convenience to do anything to win.
Whereas the “other side” generally cares about having some sense of a moral code.
Yet another reminder of why I left Twitter
Can someone please provide context?
They are all snowflakes ❄️
Those *All Lives Matter* folks being really quiet right now for some odd reason.
She was definitely far more successful, talented, and loved than either of these people
Fuck C Kirk
Twitter is all bots now. It got old real quick
Or compare this to Babbit, as though trespassing and participating in a coup attempt is even in the same REALM as attempting to drive away from armed, masked possibly kidnappers, ICE, “special” forces, etc.
So not following KNOWN rules, laws, and repeated commands from officers, and refusing to willingly submit to armed, unidentified individuals is sooo similar to them, that the latter is worse somehow?
*quoted Charlie Kirk verbatim, but, like, disapprovingly
It’s absolutely fascinating how these people’s minds bend and curve in the most predictably stupid way possible.
something devastating needs to happen to these people. like how are they so devoid of empathy
It’s crazy how not even white lives matter to the all lives matter crowd.
It’s time to stop engaging with these motherfuckers like they have something worth engaging with.
Long past that time.
That engagement legitimatizes them.
Stop giving these motherfuckers legitamisation they don’t deserve and desperately crave.
Stop engaging with them. Walk away because they’re not worth it
They didn’t even give a shit about Kirk, only pimping his death to justify an excuse for violence.
The *sole* value of conservatism is respect for and obedience to [one’s perception of] traditionally established hierarchy, and hierarchy dictates that those on top (in-groups) are rightfully idolized and receive privileges, credibility, and resources, while those on the bottom (out-groups) are demonized/dehumanized and/or bound by restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources.
To them, the second-greatest injustice imaginable is for those [they perceive to be] on the bottom [of social hierarchy] to have access to the rights, credibility, and resources reserved for those on top. The first greatest injustice is for those on top to be bound by the restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources reserved for those on the bottom.
[Conservatism](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservatism) — by definition — is “a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, **stressing the importance of established hierarchies and institutions** (such as religion, the family, **and class structure**), and preferring gradual development to abrupt change”.
Likewise, from [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conservatism/):
>Rational conservatives maintain that a community with a **hierarchy of authority is most conducive to human well-being**.
>Confucius is another possible precursor. […] **his stress on authority and hierarchy prefigures central conservative themes**.
>With the Enlightenment, the natural order or **social hierarchy, previously largely accepted, was questioned**.
Western conservatism is a product from the Age of Enlightenment — specifically, a [Counter-Enlightenment](https://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/i7705.pdf), [a reactionary challenge to Humanism](https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/counter-enlightenment/). Its philosophers *rejected* a society governed by logic and reason, human rights and dignity, science and democracy, as its ideology *solely appeal* to the authority of traditionally established hierarchies.
From the [Intellectual Roots of Conservatism: The Burkean Foundations](https://www.britannica.com/topic/conservatism/Intellectual-roots-of-conservatism), the man considered to be the founder of modern day Western conservatism had such to say about his ideology:
>Burke shocked his contemporaries by insisting with brutal frankness that **“illusions” and “prejudices” are socially necessary**. He believed that most **human beings are innately depraved, steeped in original sin, and unable to better themselves with their feeble reason**. Better, he said, to rely on the “latent wisdom” of prejudice, which accumulates slowly through the years, than to “put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason.” **Among such prejudices are those that favour an established church and a landed aristocracy**; members of the latter, according to Burke, are the “great oaks” and “proper chieftains” of society, provided that they temper their rule with a spirit of timely reform and remain within the constitutional framework.
Conservatives absolutely need an underclass [for society] to demonize and dehumanize in order to maintain [their] hierarchy, and every single one of their policies and rhetoric work to do exactly that. Every right-wing accusation is a confession — every single one; always! — because it is never *the act itself* that upsets them, but rather, the *social standing* of the person doing the act, as said act is a privilege meant for those on top of [their perceived] hierarchy (See also: pedophilia – Trump and Catholic church vs. LGBTQ+ and drag queens).
Numerous [investigations](https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-politics-violence-far-right/) and studies show that:
>[Perceived victimhood, authoritarianism, populism, and white identity are the most powerful predictors of support for violence, though military service, conspiratorial thinking, anxiety, and feelings of powerlessness are also related.](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/who-supports-political-violence/9A6BE3C153607A2E26B5DF8076F1753D)”
>[Although incidents from the left are on the rise, political violence still comes overwhelmingly from the right, whether one looks at the Global Terrorism Database, FBI statistics, or other government or independent counts](https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/),
>[Radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2122593119)
>[Right-wing populists are generally more likely to justify political violence compared to mainstream voters and non-voters](https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12668?af=R)
>[Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/right-wing-extremist-violence-is-more-frequent-and-deadly-than-left-wing-violence-data-shows#)
Violence is a tool meant for those on top to use upon those on the bottom to ensure the latter’s submission and obedience, and *never* vice versa. “Know your place” is their mantra.
Ong. I brought this up earlier, but they were literally hollering, snotting, and turning red crying over that man. Calling the left animals, then do stuff like this. They wanted us to condemn violence even though we had no idea if the guy was even left or right, then IMMEDIATELY went after HBCUs. These people just straight up hate America and anyone else that isn’t licking boots
To be fair, Briahna Joy Gray is an idiot, sooooooooooooooooo
Imagine naming your account Hugh Retard and thinking the world absolutely has to hear what you have to say about anything.
I don’t even know what the hell Ronald Dregan is supposed to mean, but naming yourself after one of, if not THE most infamous corporate leg-humping politicians in our history (pre-2016 anyway) tells me they don’t have much brain activity going on either.
Overall, of course a couple of rabid nazis bring nothing of value to the table. Afterall, they’re only here because their dad fucked a pig, and he only did that because he confused it for his sister.
Brianna Joy Gray told people to not vote for Kamala Harris.
Wtaf
They laugh at other peoples pain which is why I laugh at theirs! Fuck Charlie Kirk and his baby teeth.
They’re calling a White mother a domestic terrorist if that doesn’t show non white maga that they’ll never be one of the good ones nothing will.