I love both movies btw but even I knew this foul when this article first came out.

    by abdul_bino

    21 Comments

    1. Fun-Pickle-9821 on

      This is what racism looks like. Very subtle, and leaves plenty of room for plausible deniability. But it sends a clear message to every person who looks at it.

    2. DiceMadeOfCheese on

      How you spend $70 million on a movie about ping pong?

      TBF, I have not seen it, so if there’s an alien invasion or something halfway through please let me know.

    3. iwasboredsoyeah on

      Reminds me of the coverage during Hurricane Katrina. Black people were “looting”, but white people were “finding” resources.

    4. could the original intention of the sinners article have been to highlight the WB expectations for profits vs A24 films generally turning much smaller profits? that said even if it was, it still comes off like they were trying to undercut the success of what will surely be a prolific film. as several philosophers contended, it’s not about the intention, it’s the consequence.

    5. background_action92 on

      I liked Sinners and everyone knocked it out of the park, acting wise. But, that being said, even though that 70 milly budget is there( the cost of the settings are I imagine really expensive) it’s easier to sell a cool premise like Sinners than a ping pong catch me if you can movie like Supreme.

      That movie is getting numbers on Chalamet going balls to the walls in the marketing department with little to no a24 investment.

    6. FingerButHoleCrone on

      My one wish for Variety is that some psychologist call this “the Variety Bias” in an academic paper so that it forever becomes part of the brand.

    7. Zestyclose_Ad_5815 on

      The reason Sinners received stupid coverage was because Coogler (the writer/director) negotiated a deal that made him the owner to the movie’s rights after 20 years. Nearly all movies are owned by the studios, making the deal highly unusual and in order to try to discourage fellow filmmakers from asking the same thing, the industry started running hit pieces. While race plays a part, it wasn’t the driving force.

    8. EatMyShortzZzZzZ on

      I believe the studio managed to save money funding Coogler by giving him full ownership of the movie after a number of years and other things, thinking it would be a flop. Then it turned out to be a massive success and WB got salty lol.

    9. dreams_andnightmares on

      Ben Stiller called this shit out for what it was. Folks really want to act like a film earning 2/3’s of its budget during opening week is underperforming. Not to mention all of the pocket watching they were doing with Coogler. Just weird dog whistles.

    10. This is just like Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton. The Sun said ‘omg look how cute, Kate is touching her baby bump!!’ And then with Meghan it was ‘disgusting Meghan putting her gross hands on her barely there bump, she’s so performative!!’.

    Leave A Reply