Info is from Statistics Canada and the charts are made in Krita
cre8ivjay on
I wonder if it’s CMA based or city proper.
Vancouver proper is incredibly dense, but places like Surrey would be lower.
Calgary, while still doing better than many on this list is mostly one city with all kinds of density – higher and lower – throughout.
InternationalReserve on
Whatever way they’ve defined “Ottawa” is must not include some of the amalgamated areas for some reason, because otherwise there’s no way the population density is that high. Looking through the data-set it seems like they do indeed count Kanata seperately
4 Comments
Including Hamilton and Oshawa is skewing the graph. Toronto feels way more dense than Montreal.
Source: [https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=9810001101](https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=9810001101)
Info is from Statistics Canada and the charts are made in Krita
I wonder if it’s CMA based or city proper.
Vancouver proper is incredibly dense, but places like Surrey would be lower.
Calgary, while still doing better than many on this list is mostly one city with all kinds of density – higher and lower – throughout.
Whatever way they’ve defined “Ottawa” is must not include some of the amalgamated areas for some reason, because otherwise there’s no way the population density is that high. Looking through the data-set it seems like they do indeed count Kanata seperately