This is a crinkle-crankle wall, a design that uses about 40% less material than a straight wall

    by The_best_username_25

    42 Comments

    1. I dont get how it uses less material? Isn’t a straight line the shorter path from A to B? Hence less material?

    2. A straight wall needs to be wider so it doesn’t tip, so atleast a double row, where as a curvy wall only needs a single row. Thats where the bricks are saved

    3. MarbleLemon7000 on

      For others wondering how this design uses less material despite its longer length, notice how it is built with a single thickness of brick. 

    4. Building one takes just as long as a regular wall, however, on account of all the countless seconds wasted by people saying “crinkle-crankle wall” instead of just “wall.”

    5. Sustainable_Twat on

      Just to clarify, a straight wall will use less bricks, but this arrangement offers much more stability.

    6. Square-Tangerine2926 on

      Even if it saves material I’d be cursing every time I had to mow and trim those lawns. This is someone who hates landscapers.

    7. …of the same strength. Very important piece of the sentence that is intentionally left off for some reason. To drive engagement? I don’t know, does engagement need to be driven on Reddit? What’s the point of that?

    8. A long time ago, I was on a tour of some small town that a famous writer lived in (I don’t remember the writer or the town’s name). They had a wall like this and the tour guide told us it was a memorial to the path he would walk home from the bar.

    9. Far_Consideration_63 on

      I imagine they also last longer. The curves give room for expansion and contraction from ambient temperature. Pipelines for example have bends in them for that reason. 🤔

    10. Seems counter-intuitive. I would guess it uses more since it is taking a longer route between a and b. What the hell to I know?

    11. Do not understand how it uses less material when it’s traveling what seems to be more distance. But who am I, I don’t know

    12. Imo this should be rephrased as “uses about 40% less material than a straight wall *of similar strength.*”

      Obviously a straight line of the same thickness would use less material. However, a straight wall only one brick thick would be very weak, much weaker than this sinusoidal wall. A straight wall that matches the strength would have to be much thicker and would use more material.

    13. For anyone curious, it uses less bricks because it’s thinner. A straight wall would need to be more thick to obtain a similiar level of strctural stability and require more bricks.

    14. I believe it’s 40% stronger. I don’t understand how it takes fewer materials?

    15. StickEarly2946 on

      Mathematically impossible. Proof that the average reddior is dumber than a pile of shit of you think a curvy wall uses less material than a straight one.

    Leave A Reply